Tivo is the greatest invention in the history of Civilization. Really. Though some old fashioned types would argue for fire (big down side in dry areas), the wheel (anyone seen the price of gas?), or the printing press (like, you can’t be serious!), I will stick with Tivo. What else allows one to binge on classic television without paying!
My wife and I finished the X-files lately and now have turned to Buffy the Vampire Slayer. This is a show that is clever and well written even if it does jump the shark with a vengeance in a dream episode (following the destruction of the Initiative) that makes Bobby in the shower look like Shakespeare. (Memo to television executives: dream episodes are danger.)
However, the larksome group of Scoobies is almost entirely amoral. Most episodes contain a wearisome load of Clinton era sermonizing . . . and clumsy attempts to make us believe that utter promiscuity can be survived by a group of young adults with no moral center. Let’s face it John Chrysostom, Calvin, heck even Luther (not to mention Plato!) would find this all pretty repulsive. After all Aristophanes was funny while convincing folk that killing philosophers was just good fun.
What if the point of life is not to have fun? What if watching things that support bad ideas is, well, bad? Is the time spent watching Buffy, which now is not even cool, time well spent? What good is it? How is it helping my soul?
What if human flourishing requires being utterly and totally out of it?
Maybe Tivo is not so great after all.
I can hear my students groaning. Isn’t this legalism? Haven’t we just escaped fundamentalism and aren’t you trying to return us to it by some back door?
No. It is simply Aristotle and every other reasonable person who ever lived. The problems with fundamentalism were not in the area of holiness, but in picking battles. If I am without love, then my not smoking will not cover up for it . . . a lesson modern liberalism is just now dealing with here in California where liberals are now smoke free and as cranky as a church lady at a pool hall.
Many of my friends think the biggest problem facing the church is post-modernism. I wish I thought that were true. French philosophers who make no sense without their jargon (the French don’t care what they think as long as nobody else can understand it.) are not much of a threat to modern Americans. Let’s face it, most of us cannot pronounce Foucault without laughing let alone take him seriously as the provider of an all-encompassing worldview. We are more apt to say “Whatever�? than “hegemonic discourse�? when someone tries to get us down.
My students (and yes, their professors!) struggle with the simple desire to live for pleasure. Now I am all for that if by pleasure we mean true human flourishing. I want to be happy . . . really, really happy. Sadly, I have discovered that living my life to be happy in the short term pretty much guarantees I will not be (happy) and does mean that I will be rotten. The worst news is that no product or change of attitude can change the damage I do to be soul if I live for short-term pleasure. Drive your car caring only about today’s destination and you will be getting a new car on the morrow. Run your life caring only about today’s happiness and you will want to trade in for a new life and no Clarence will be able to convince you that yours has been a wonderful life.
Every generation of lightly read adults has a new reason for their simple hedonism. Skinner helped their parents, now post-modernism helps today’s students. They don’t understand the ideas, but they have some vague sense that if they say, “What is truth anyway?�? that grownups will nod knowingly and let them have another beer.
Nothing new in that. Alcibiades had his sophists. Beau Brummel his Enlightenment. Benedict Arnold his justifications. Elvis had the worry about the bomb. We have Foucault.
But while we watch Buffy and ingest her hapless ways somebody should remind us that: love flees the promiscuous, souls get damaged by sin and are hard (if not impossible) to repair, and time wasted cannot be regained.
We have to find our function, what humans are meant to do and do that. Which seems simple enough until you remember that humans are the only reasoning animals of which we are aware . . . Mr. Ed, PETA, NFL sideline reporters not with standing. We are designed to think and thinking requires giving up some good for others. It also requires giving up behavior that takes away the time we need to meditate, pray, dialogue, and read.
Which brings me to Hugh Hewitt’s recent question. Should we be watching MTV? Of course somebody must just to find out what new hedonistic sewer is now recommended living space for modern young adults. If you are running the metaphysical hospital than you will have to go there. Or you might be trying to change the culture of pop music and create actual art and so need to know what the competition is up to. I suppose, though it hard to imagine what would have happened to young Mozart in the modern studio system. He hardly survived his father and a few lunatic royal patrons. What would have happened when marketing found Magic Flute?
MTV is all about (from what I can see) hedonism, consumerism, and materialism. It is void of spiritual values (any spiritual values) and full of empty-headed people who think looking good is being good. What sage has every recommend spending our time with that? Time spent on MTV (or on Christian television for that matter) could be spent with your family, or making something, or talking . . . or just about anything. It is not going to lead to human flourishing in any large doses and it is hard to “get�? in small doses.
The rest of us probably should turn off MTV, or Nick at Night, or the Sci Fi channel, or even talk radio (some of the time!) and try living our life and not watching it. Should I want my Buffy? Probably not. Small amounts of television will not kill me and amusement can be amusing on a holiday, but if I want to be happy, then I will spend most of my time someplace else.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.
