Mel Gibson is evidently a fool with hateful views. Nothing justifies them and the fact that he has some power in my movement worries me. It also makes me sad that the good things he has done will have to be considered again in the light of his bad ideas.
However, today Israel is fighting for its life. Its foe, really Iran, hates Israel and would wipe it off the map. A man who is hateful, an open anti-Semite, leads it and he has money and great power. It is very sad that the great Persian nation is in the hands of such a wicked man and applauds him.
Gibson or Iran: I know which worries me more, but both worry me some. Anti-Semitism is raging in the world and we know where that leads on the right and on the left. We cannot fight it too hard or forget the horrors of my grandparents’ time. The cost was too great.
Given that, why is Lieberman the target of the anti-War left? What is the Left’s plan to deal with Iran? Assuming one is not a pacifist, and almost no Christians in any place or time have been pacifists, what would Lamont do to tame Iran?
Why did the far Left go after religious Old Joe and not rising star Hilary?
No Republican is going to elect Mel to anything now, but the crazy left may finish off Lieberman. Why Lieberman?
It worries me the same way Pat Buchanan’s rumblings about neo-Cons who suddenly all have “Jewish” names when he speaks worry me, but Pat’s types are not very welcome in today’s Republican party. What is the sub-text of the attack on Lieberman?
I am afraid of the answer. We need, really need, two sane and healthy parties.